Pages

Monday, August 8, 2022

Gukesh vs Abdusattorov


To wonder is human. To drive hard enough to be able to achieve anything takes a certain disquiet..



 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2S-1BFc2zvo


Chess is a conversation between two players. Like other forms of conversation it has set pieces (its vocabulary) and moves (its syntax). The arrangement of pieces and the sequence of moves is how one player converses with the other. Conversations played out over a chess board are objectively coherent because the rules that regulate it are rigid to the extreme. But within this closed system lies an eternity of possibilities: those observing a game will always agree on what’s been said but do not typically agree on how to proceed. In chess each player plays to win. Or, when a win is not possible, to draw. This is not the case for most conversations. The structure of human interaction is rarely predicated by confrontation and strategic play. Except in sociopaths. And games like chess. A win shows an opponent - as well as those observing - who played better during a particular game. Winning and, especially winning regularly, is an indication of value to the wider community of chess players and observers. In human terms the desire to be valued is the desire to be loved. 


At this level conversations are always tense, often complicated, sometimes beautiful, and very addictive.




Saturday, July 30, 2022

A group of strangers meet for lunch..



Modernist: “There is an objective truth and we will understand it if we are methodical and coherent in our approach.”


20th century postmodernist: “You claim objectivity but your history and conscious processing is necessarily biased and subjective. Truth is an ideal that is hard or impossible to achieve.”


Me: “I believe in an objective reality but don’t understand much about it.”


Modernist: “I can teach you.”


21st century postmodernist [to the modernist]: “Keep your metanarrative to yourself. My lived experience shows your position to be a construct of preference and prejudice.”


Anarchist: “Yes. And should be subverted.”


Historian: “Steady on. Your positions have relevance but please be mindful of where your ideas come from.”


Me [addressing the historian, anarchist and 21st century postmodernist]: “I need established order to find my place in this world. I cannot deny the world that pervades my present and my past.”


Max Planck: “That might be harder than you think. I had to get around it by creating a mathematical fudge factor.”


Werner Heisenberg: “He’s right. We have to remember that what we observe is not nature itself but nature exposed to our method of questioning.”


Erwin Schrödinger: “I have an equation that can help you with that.”


20th century postmodernist [to Erwin Schrödinger]: “Sure, but that still left us with a lot of unanswered questions.” [looking to Planck and Heisenberg] “You created a whole new field to extend your chosen narrative.”


21st century postmodernist: “And subject to irrelevance given the constructs from which they arose.”


Religious person: “Everyone, stop worrying! There is a book that guides the soul and connects us with God. That, surely, is far more important.”


Religious fundamentalist: “Yes, there is a book but you must read it really carefully. It is absolute.”


Modernist [to the religious fundamentalist]: “Are you for real?”


Religious fundamentalist [to the modernist]: “Are you for real?”


Modernist: “You’re a fanatic.”


Religious fundamentalist: “You are blind. Your life is emptiness cloaked in a veneer of reason. The parlay of incomplete ideas into politics and society has destroyed millions and disempowered countless more.”


Historian: “Yes.. this needs to be a nuanced conversation. Let’s order lunch.”


[everyone looks at each other]


21st century postmodernist: “Fuck you guys, I’m leaving.” 


Anarchist: “Yeah, you guys are so fucked up.” [addressing the modernist and religious fundamentalist] “Next time I see youse, I’m going to fuck youse up.”


Modernist: “This is going nowhere. I have matters of consequence to attend to..”


20th century postmodernist: “I’ll join you.. and check your work.”


Religious fundamentalist: “You will all burn in hell.”


Religious person: “Don’t worry about them.” [getting up and touching me on the shoulder] “I sincerely hope you find your way through this.”


Historian [awkwardly]: “Umm.. that was quick.. .. .. Best be on my way.”


...


Me: “Where’s everyone gone?”


Werner Heisenberg: “I’m already dead.”


Max Planck and Erwin Schrödinger: “So are we.”


Planck, Heisenberg and Schrödinger: “But our work endures. It remains useful.”



Me [at the counter]: “I’ll take a ham sandwich to go thanks.”






Saturday, May 28, 2022

Bianchi collection


An impressive Bianchi collection recently sold by Australian cycling outlet alchemycycletrader.com.au


Bianchi Competizione 1963






Bianchi Specialissima X3 early 1980s








Bianchi Centenario 1985








Bianchi Specialissima X4 Argentin 1987









Bianchi SBX (1st gen Campagnolo Record Ergopower) early 1990s








Bianchi Megapro XL Pantani 1998









Passione Celeste